University Conduct Review Process

I. INTRODUCTION

Responsibility for student discipline is vested in the President by the Board of Trustees. To exercise this responsibility, the President established the University Conduct Council, which reports through the Vice President for Student Affairs. Upon the recommendation of the University Conduct Council and the Vice President for Student Affairs, the President has accepted the following document delineating the conduct review process for students at SMU.

PHILOSOPHY AND PURPOSE A university is a complex institution. It is distinctive from anything else in society and therefore, the focus of its norms is distinctive. Further, a private university is an elite institution; admittance and attendance is a privilege granted on the assumption that the applicant who has voluntarily enrolled in the institution shares the university’s values and goals and is committed to its purpose. If a student’s values and goals are not consistent with those of the university, the privilege of attendance may be terminated.

The conduct review process at SMU provides a fair disciplinary procedure for an accused individual (respondent) or student group and the University and to help induce maturity and learning by erring students, while enforcing the behavior requirements deemed necessary to an academic institution. It also exists to protect the balance between the rights of the respondent and those of the university community as a whole.

SMU emphasizes learning and behavioral development. The conduct review process is not an adversarial process of antagonists striving to best one another. It is more in the nature of a community seeking to learn if error has occurred and, if so, deciding how best to act so that in the future there will be less error. Its watchwords are serious in purpose, considerate in process, appropriate in response.

The conduct review process is an educational process, one that promotes growth, understanding, responsibility and accountability. The majority representation on all boards is students. The University does not allow attorneys to actively participate in any way in the University’s conduct review process.

The University recognizes that some violations may be handled concurrently by the University and civil and/or criminal authorities. The criminal court process is separate and distinct from the student conduct review process, which determines only violations of the Student Code and imposes sanctions within the University community. As such, a concurrent action by both processes does not constitute double jeopardy. The judgment of the Vice President for Student Affairs is the final determinant as to the University’s response to any student behavior. Cases of academic dishonesty are handled under the jurisdiction of the Honor Code and the Honor Council.

A. Overview of the Discipline Process

1. Complaint is filed or report is received.

2. Notice of alleged violations is provided and hearing scheduled.

3. A hearing occurs.

4. If a respondent is found responsible for violation of policy, sanctions are issued.

5. A respondent may appeal the outcome of a conduct hearing.

Definitions:

1. Respondent - Student or student group who has allegedly violated policy.

2. Complainant - Person(s) or entity making a complaint or referral regarding a student or student group who allegedly violated policy.

3. University Conduct Officer - A University staff member trained in the conduct review process.

4. FERPA - The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. The privacy and confidentiality of all student records shall be preserved in accordance with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 as amended.

5. Conduct Liaison - A University faculty or staff member trained in the conduct review process. Both respondents and complainants will have an opportunity to meet with a Conduct Liaison regarding questions on the conduct review process.

B. Rights of Complainants and Respondents

1. Complainants and respondents involved in a conduct hearing will each be offered the opportunity to consult with a Conduct Liaison(s) provided by the Student Conduct and Community Standards Office. The Conduct Liaison(s) will remain in a neutral role throughout the process.

2. Respondents and complainants may have two people serve as support persons during the conduct hearing. Such persons are for silent moral support.

3. Respondents may remain silent, before, during, and after the hearing and may make a statement explaining the reasons for remaining silent.

4. Respondents and complainants may challenge any member serving on a University Conduct Board on grounds of prejudice or bias.

5. Complainants and respondents may remain present during the conduct hearing process.

6. If living on campus, students involved in a conduct matter who live near or with each other may request to have living arrangements modified pending the outcome of the hearing.

7. If the incident involves an alleged sexual assault or sexual misconduct, sexual history is irrelevant and should not be discussed during the hearing.

8. A University Conduct Officer and/or University Conduct Board may accommodate concerns for the personal safety, well-being, and/or fears of confrontation of the Complainant, Accused Student, and/or other witness during the hearing by providing separate facilities, by using a visual screen, and/or by permitting participation by telephone, videophone, closed circuit television, video conferencing, videotape, audio tape, written statement, or other means, where and as determined in the sole judgment of the Dean of Student Life to be appropriate.

C. Conduct Procedures

1. Initiation of the Conduct Review Process

A. A written formal complaint (including, but not limited to, Police reports, RLSH incident reports, and personal complaints) documenting an alleged violation of policy may be filed with the University through the Office of the Dean of Student Life for up to six months from the date of the incident and/or discovery by the complainant of the alleged policy violation.

B. A University Conduct Officer may investigate the alleged violations, whether the incident occurs on or off campus.

C. If a University Conduct Officer determines that a policy may have been violated, the matter shall be resolved through a conduct hearing.

D. The University, at its discretion, may proceed with the conduct review process without a formal written complaint.

2. Action Pending a Conduct Hearing If student or student group behavior presents an on-going threat of disruption to the community or is a danger to the safety of the student or others, the Dean of Student Life may impose such sanctions as s/he deems appropriate pending a conduct hearing.

3. Mandatory Administrative Withdrawal If student behavior presents an on-going threat of disruption to the community or is a danger to the safety of the student or others to such a degree that resolution through the University Conduct Review Process is not possible, the Dean of Student Life may, with the consultation of the Vice President for Student Affairs, mandate an immediate withdrawal of the student from the University. Such mandatory withdrawal may include, but is not limited to: withdrawal from academic classes, removal from any university-owned housing, suspension from participation in any University activity. The Dean of Student Life may impose conditions and/or a time period for the withdrawal and the student may not return to the University until all such conditions and expiration of the time period are met.

Students are required to maintain a current local address, telephone number, and e-mail address on file with the University Registrar at all times.

4. Notice of Alleged Violation(s) and Conduct Hearing Notification

A. Notification of the hearing will be emailed to the respondent.

1. Notification of the hearing will include date, time, and location of the hearing. The hearing will be scheduled according to the respondent’s class schedule.

2. Notification will be sent a minimum of four (4) calendar days (excluding school holidays) prior to the hearing.

3. The email will be sent to the respondent’s email address as listed on record with the University Registrar’s Office.

B. The Notice of Alleged Violation(s) and a copy of the hearing notification will be mailed to the respondent.

1. The Notice of Alleged Violation(s) will include the following information:

a) a brief description of the incident

b) date(s) of the incident

c) the alleged policy violations

2. Notification will be sent a minimum of four (4) calendar days (excluding school holidays) prior to the hearing.

3. Notification is mailed to the respondent’s mailing address as listed on file with the University Registrar’s office.

C. The respondent may waive the right to four (4) calendar days hearing notification by mutual agreement of the respondent and Conduct Officer.

D. When the respondent is a student organization, notice will be sent to the student organization president, and the SMU faculty/staff advisor.

E. When the respondent is a fraternity or sorority, notice will be sent to the appropriate fraternity or sorority council advisor.

5. Conduct Hearing Process

A. The respondent will meet with a Conduct Officer to discuss the alleged violations.

B. If the respondent does not arrive to the scheduled hearing, the Conduct Officer may determine the outcome of the case without the respondent being present.

C. The Conduct Officer may determine the outcome of the case administratively by assigning responsibility and sanctions.

D. If the Conduct Officer is unable to determine the outcome of the case for one or more of the following reasons, the Conduct Officer may refer the case to a University Conduct Board:

1. The respondent does not accept responsibility for violating policy.

2. The respondent does not accept the sanctions.

3. The alleged offense has resulted in substantial interference with proceedings of the University.

4. The offenses are repeated.

5. A student organization has allegedly violated a policy.

D. Reporting of Proceedings Any publication from within the University (including The Daily Campus and other publications by students) related to a conduct hearing must abide by the following guidelines:

1. The privacy and confidentiality of all student records shall be preserved in accordance with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 as amended.

2. Should the respondent and/or responsible party (parties) make public statements or declarations regarding a conduct hearing, this action may free the University to comment on any such statements and/or the matter being discussed.

E. Information Pertaining to Hearings Resolved Administratively and by a University Conduct Board

1. The standard of proof in all conduct hearings is the greater weight of the credible evidence.

2. Neither the respondent nor the complainant may be actively represented by an attorney at any hearing or at any other time throughout the hearing process. Parents or family members who are attorneys may not be present in a lawyer capacity.

3. All conduct hearings shall be closed to the general public. University staff in training may attend hearings. The Vice President for Student Affairs will have the authority to permit attendance of one or more University observers at any time during the course of the hearing.

4. In hearings involving more than one respondent, a Conduct Officer, at his or her discretion, may permit the hearings concerning each respondent to be conducted separately.

5. Any change in the allegation against a respondent shall be regarded as a new complaint subject to the conduct review process.

6. The hearing will be held even if the respondent fails to attend. As necessary, hearings and appeals will go forward during summer through procedures to be determined by the Vice President for Student Affairs.

F. Procedures Specific to University Conduct Boards

The University Conduct Boards will include, but not be limited to, the following procedures:

A Conduct Liaison(s) will meet with the complainant and the respondent separately prior to a University Conduct Board to provide both parties with pre-hearing information. A Conduct Liaison(s) will be present during the University Conduct Board proceeding, but will not question witnesses, provide statements, or speak on behalf of the student.

1. University Conduct Board proceedings may be recorded (audio) by a University Conduct Officer from the Dean of Student Life Office.

A. The Dean of Student Life Office will store the recording for the length of time the file is kept.

B. Deliberations will not be recorded.

2. The Chair of a board shall maintain order for the proper conduct of the hearing.

A. When necessary, the Chair may expel disruptive individuals or adjourn the hearing to a later time to assure the full development of facts in a calm, deliberate setting.

B. The Chair shall conduct the hearing in a manner that will bring forward all relevant evidence.

C. The Chair will exercise discretion to resolve any procedural issues raised.

D. The Chair may, at his/her discretion, grant extensions of time, at any point, as may be reasonably necessary to permit the respondent sufficient time to prepare his/her defense.

E. The Chair may, also in his/her discretion, grant an extension of time to the complainant and/or respondent, at any time, so that additional evidence may be made available to the hearing board.

F. If after the hearing has commenced the board discovers the need for more preparation or more time to hear testimony, the Chair shall recess the hearing to a later time. The board may then direct any further investigation for its proper disposition of the case.

G. Inability to obtain witnesses shall not be justification for undue delay in continuing a hearing.

3. The University will attempt to notify, in writing, witnesses to be called by the University.

A. Such notice shall tell the time, place, and date of the hearing.

B. The University shall notify members of the student community that failure to appear as a witness may result in a charge against them for “Failure to Comply.” (See Section 3.11 of the Student Code of Conduct).

4. A minimum of three (3) calendar days (excluding school holidays) prior to the hearing, the respondent will be given a list of those witnesses and any documents whose testimony will be presented in person or by summation through a University Conduct Officer and a brief summary of the anticipated testimony.

5. The respondent shall present to a University Conduct Officer a list of witnesses (including a brief description of the anticipated testimony) and a copy of all documents to be submitted to the board a minimum of two (2) calendar days (excluding school holidays) prior to the hearing, so that copies may be made for the board.

6. Additional witnesses and documents may be called at the discretion of the hearing board.

7. A University Conduct Officer, the complainant, and the respondent may present witnesses and direct questions to all witnesses.

A. Members of the board may also direct questions to all witnesses.

B. The Chair, at his/her discretion, may require that questions be submitted first to him/her who will then direct the questions to the witness(es).

8. Each party in the case will have the right to make an opening and closing statement.

A. The complainant may give the first opening statement.

B. The respondent may give the last closing statement.

C. The complainant and the respondent may each include a statement of the impact of the alleged offense as part of a closing statement.

9. Once the hearing has concluded, the board will deliberate in executive session (i.e., board members only) to reach a decision.

A. All members, including the Chair, may vote, and all determinations shall be by majority vote.

B. If there is a finding of responsibility, the board will impose sanctions.

C. If the respondent is found not responsible, the case may not be re-heard at a future date.

10. The board’s decision will be presented in writing within three (3) calendar days (excluding school holidays) to the Office of the Dean of Student Life and will include findings of fact, responsibility or non-responsibility and the rationale for the findings.

11. The Office of the Dean of Student Life will notify the respondent of the board’s decision within three (3) calendar days (excluding school holidays).

G. Composition of University Conduct Boards

1. Boards are composed of three (3) students, one (1) faculty member, and one (1) staff member.

2. Whenever possible, members from the University Conduct Board pool will be selected to serve on a random basis.

3. Any member of a board may withdraw voluntarily. If there is no quorum and a member is excluded, the hearing will be delayed until an alternate member of the University Conduct Board pool can be selected.

H. Quorum Requirements for University Conduct Boards

1. Four (4) members of the board (any combination) shall be present throughout the hearing. If less than the required number is present at the opening of the hearing, the hearing shall be postponed until four (4) members can be convened. These requirements may be waived in writing upon agreement of all parties.

2. Once the hearing has commenced, if a board member should need to withdraw for a period of less than thirty (30) calendar days (excluding school holidays), the hearing shall recess until all members can be present.

3. Once the hearing has commenced, if a board member should need to withdraw for a period of more than thirty (30) calendar days (excluding school holidays) or permanently, the respondent may request that the hearing continue with the remaining hearing board members and it may do so if the complainant agrees. Otherwise, a new hearing will be scheduled.

I. University Conduct Board Membership and Training

1. A minimum of nine (9) students for University Conduct Boards shall be selected through an application and interview process conducted by the Dean of Student Life Office.

2. A minimum of three (3) faculty members and three (3) staff members to serve on the boards shall be selected through a nomination process conducted by the Dean of Student Life Office.

3. All board members will be appointed to serve on a specific board on a random basis, whenever possible.

4. Every attempt will be made to ensure that board members reflect the full diversity of the University.

5. Board members will receive training in, but not limited to:

a) conduct policies and procedures;

b) hearing board member responsibilities and ethical considerations;

c) questioning techniques;

d) other relevant information as determined by the Dean of Student Life Office.

6. Staff, Faculty, or students may serve as the Chair if they have attended the required training provided by the Student Conduct and Community Standards Office.

J. Member Responsibilities of University Conduct Review Process

Members of the University conduct review process (University Conduct Council, the Honor Council, University Conduct Boards, Conduct Officers) pledge themselves to the following:

1. To ensure that the policies of the University are maintained by conducting a fair hearing of violations of rules and policies of the University;

2. To provide an appropriate response and, as needed, sanction persons found responsible for violations of University regulations and policies;

3. To maintain impartiality about the matter and/or person or group under consideration, and when unable to do so, readily withdraw from the consideration of that matter;

4. To act not as an advocate for the students nor for the University, but to consider equally the needs of individual students, student groups, and the needs of the University community as a whole;

5. To maintain confidentiality of all details pertinent to a matter and of all actions related to a hearing and to refrain from comment on actions or persons involved in a conduct hearing;

6. To participate in training sessions and meetings;

7. To report to the Office of the Dean of Student Life if approached by persons in an attempt to influence a conduct decision.

8. To inform the Office of the Dean of Student Life and submit a letter of resignation if members find they are unable to meet the requirements of the conduct review process.

9. To adhere to all provisions of the conduct review process and the Student Code of Conduct. Members of the University Conduct Council, the Honor Council, or University Conduct Boards found to be responsible for violating the Student Code of Conduct or convicted of a criminal offense will be suspended from serving as a member of the conduct review process by the Vice President of Student Affairs.

K. Graduate Hearing Boards

The Dedman School of Law, the Perkins School of Theology, and the School of Engineering shall each appoint, as may be necessary and appropriate, hearing boards composed of staff, faculty and graduate students to hear disciplinary misconduct cases involving graduate students enrolled in their respective graduate schools.

1. The rosters of persons appointed to these boards shall be made available, as needed, to the Dean of Student Life Office.

2. All disciplinary charges against graduate students not enrolled in the Dedman School of Law, the Perkins School of Theology, or the School of Engineering will be heard through this student conduct review process.

3. As with all other hearing boards, the result of a graduate hearing board, under this process, may be appealed to the University Conduct Council appellate body.

4. Academic dishonesty cases concerning graduate students at the Cox School of Business, the Dedman School of Law, and the Perkins School of Theology are handled separately through processes established at each of those schools.

II. ORGANIZATION OF THE CONDUCT REVIEW PROCESS

The University Conduct Council, in conjunction with the Vice President for Student Affairs, makes recommendations/amendments to the procedures of the conduct review process to the President of the University.

A. Proposals are to be made to the University Conduct Council for their recommendation, but final authority to change the conduct review process rests with the University President.

B. When the University Conduct Council receives a change, the Council is required to inform the Dean of Student Life and the Student Body President of the proposal and the details of the proposal’s contents in writing. This requirement is for written notification only; approval is not required by either the Dean of Student Life or the Student Body President.

C. Students with questions regarding this process may see the Student Body Secretary or the Dean of Student Life.

D. The Vice President for Student Affairs may delegate any part or all of his/her authority from time to time, to any person or several persons, wherever he/she deems it appropriate. This person or persons is referred to as a University Conduct Officer.

E. The Vice President for Student Affairs has responsibility for establishing and maintaining the conduct review process through its various parts.

III. SANCTIONS ESTABLISHED AND DEFINED BY THE UNIVERSITY CONDUCT COUNCIL

The following sanctions may be implemented individually or in any combination by the Conduct Boards or University Conduct Officer. The President reserves the right to raise or lower sanctions imposed in the conduct review process.

A. Sanctions that indicate standing with the University:

1. EXPULSION An individual or group will be separated from the University on a permanent basis. An individual’s expulsion will be permanently recorded on his/her academic transcript. Before this sanction is enforced, the President of the University will review it. A student expelled from the University may not enter campus grounds for any reason without the express written permission from the Office of the Dean of Student Life. A student expelled from the University will not receive a refund of any monies paid, including tuition, fees, and room and board.

2. SUSPENSION An individual or group will be dismissed from the University for an assigned time period, and under the conditions deemed necessary by the conduct review process. A student suspended from the University may not enter campus grounds for any reason during the period of her/his suspension without the express written permission from the Office of the Dean of Student Life. A student suspended from the University before an academic semester ends will not receive a refund of any monies paid, including tuition, fees, and room and board. No academic credit earned during the period of suspension at any other institution may be transferred to SMU. A disciplinary suspension and its effective dates are recorded on a student’s academic transcript. The notation remains for the time the student is enrolled in the University and is removed three (3) years after graduation. If the student leaves the University before graduation, the notation is removed three (3) years after the anticipated date of graduation from the University.

3. DEFERRED SUSPENSION Individual or group suspension may be deferred (not enforced). Deferred terms, i.e., conditions of the deferred suspension and its duration, will be set by the Conduct Officer or Conduct Board which imposed the sanction. If a succeeding Conduct Officer or Conduct Board finds the student responsible for violating the terms of deferred suspension during the period set up by the preceding Conduct Officer or Conduct Board, the student may be suspended.

4. DISCIPLINARY PROBATION A student or group is given a warning that further violations will result in consideration of suspension. The student or a group representative may be required to report to a University Conduct Officer on a regular basis during the period of the probation.

5. CONDUCT REPRIMAND The individual or group will be given formal notice by the Conduct Board or the Conduct Officer that they have violated the Student Code of Conduct or University policy. If the individual or group is found in violation of a further charge, that case will be considered more seriously.

B. Below is the list of additional sanctions that may be imposed:

Note: Students who fail to complete their sanctions within the allotted time period may be subject to having their registration cancelled and/or having a hold placed on their official university records, which may prohibit them from registration, reenrolling, or receiving transcripts.

1. REASSIGNMENT OF HOUSING LOCATION/CANCELLATION OF THE HOUSING CONTRACT A student removed from the residence halls for an assigned time period or expelled from the residence halls on a permanent basis may not enter any residence hall without the express written permission from the Office of Residence Life and Student Housing. A student who is reassigned to a residence hall due to disciplinary action may only enter the newly assigned residence hall. The reassigned student may not enter any other residence hall without the express written permission from the Office of Residence Life and Student Housing. If the student’s housing contract is still in force at the time of the suspension or expulsion, no refund of the housing deposit or fee will be made.

2. RESIDENCE HALL PROBATION Student is advised that additional violations on or off campus could result in having to move to another room or hall or being removed from housing.

3. FINES An individual may be fined any amount determined to be appropriate by the Conduct Officer. An organization can be fined any amount commensurate with the severity of the offense. Fines resulting from an alcohol policy violation will be a minimum of $100 and fines resulting from a drug policy violation will be $500.

4. DISQUALIFICATION FROM HOLDING OFFICIAL STUDENT POSITIONS OR PARTICIPATING IN UNIVERSITY ACTIVITIES An individual or group sanctioned will be restricted from either representing the University in an intercollegiate activity, or from participation/representation in any University activity or organization.

5. RESTITUTION An individual or group will be required to pay for damages to the person or institution for property destroyed.

6. NOTIFICATION OF PARENTS / NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS / AUTHORIZING BODY Students found responsible for a violation of the Student Code of Conduct may be required to inform their parents of their involvement in the policy violation, or the University may notify the parents directly of a violation, as allowed under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (1974). The Office of the Dean of Student Life may notify a group’s national organization or the appropriate university authorizing body of the group’s involvement in the policy violation.

7. SUSPENSION OF PRIVILEGES An individual or group will lose privileges that allow participation in specific activities, use specific facilities, or exercise specific privileges.

8. DISCIPLINARY VIOLATION (DV) TRANSCRIPT RECORD If the nature of the offense so warrants, the Conduct Board will record an individual’s violation on his/her academic transcript. The notation will remain for the time he/she is enrolled at the University and for three (3) years following his/her graduation. If the student leaves the University before graduation, the notation is removed three (3) years after the anticipated date of graduation from the University.

9. EDUCATIONAL SANCTIONS The objective of this sanction is education and rehabilitation. Sanctions selected will be commensurate with the offense.

10. REFERRALS TO OTHER OFFICES Students may be required to contact other offices on campus including, but not limited to, the Center for Alcohol Education and Drug Abuse Prevention.

11. DRUG TESTING Students may be subject to random on-going drug testing. The number of tests/dates will be determined by the Dean of Student Life office and the Center for Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention. The fee for drug testing will be covered by the fine charged at the time of adjudication. Any missed test, diluted test or positive test may result in immediate suspension.

12. NO CONTACT ORDER Students may be informed that they should have no contact with another student.

IV. APPEALS PROCESS

A. GROUNDS FOR APPEAL A respondent who has been found responsible for violation of the Student Code of Conduct shall have the right to request an appellate review.

1. Such written request must be received in the Office of the Dean of Student Life within four (4) calendar days (excluding school holidays) from date student was notified of the findings.

a) If the student was present for the hearing, the written appeal request must be received in the Office of the Dean of Student Life within four (4) calendar days (excluding University Holidays) from the date of the hearing.

b) If the student was not present for the hearing, the written appeal request must be received in the Office of the Dean of Student Life within (4) calendar days (excluding University Holidays) from the mailing date of the written findings to the student’s mailing address as listed on record with the University Registrar.

2. Respondents may request an appeal on the following grounds:

a) Clearly erroneous findings of fact;

b) Significant procedural irregularities that denied the respondent a fair hearing;

c) Substantial new relevant evidence not available at the time of the hearing;

d) Evidence presented at the hearing for a finding of responsibility clearly insufficient to support the charge; and

e) Sanction(s) unreasonably harsh.

B. APPELLATE PROCEDURE The procedure for the appeal will be as follows:

1. At the conclusion of each hearing, the Conduct Officer or Conduct Board chair will submit the following information to the Office of the Dean of Student Life:

a) the decision

b) the reasons for the decision

c) the reasons for the sanctions imposed.

2. The respondent must file a written request to appeal with the Office of the Dean of Student Life. The request to appeal must include the ground(s) for the appeal and the basis for each.

3. The appeals packet consisting of the above statements and documents, including the hearing board audio recording (if applicable) and a copy of the original incident report or charge will be prepared for the University Conduct Council.

4. A quorum of the University Conduct Council, which has participated in the training provided to all University Conduct Board members, shall sit as the appellate body. In no case may a member of the University Conduct Council sit to hear the appeal if he/she has not completed this training.

C. PRESENTATION The University Conduct Council shall base its decision to uphold or overturn the result of a hearing on the student’s written request for an appellate review and the summary of the hearing prepared by the Conduct Officer or the Conduct Board Chair.

1. In an appellate review, the University Conduct Council may, solely at its discretion, allow oral statements.

2. The presenters and the amount of time allowed for each statement will be determined by the University Conduct Council.

D. DETERMINATION OF APPEAL The University Conduct Council may:

1. DISMISS the case because there were such procedural irregularities at the hearing that the respondent was clearly denied a fair hearing.

2. DISMISS OR REMAND the case to the original Conduct Board or Conduct Officer because:

a. there were clearly erroneous findings of fact; or

b. there were findings of fact clearly insufficient to support the charge.

3. LOWER the sanctions imposed based on a finding that the sanctions are unreasonably harsh.

4. REMAND the case to the original Conduct Board or Conduct Officer if there is significant new evidence that was discovered between the time of the original hearing decision and the time of the appeal.

5. UPHOLD the result of the hearing.

V. THE UNIVERSITY CONDUCT COUNCIL

The University Conduct Council, as the basic unit responsible for conduct appeals in response to student disciplinary and academic dishonesty problems, is accountable to the President of the University through the Vice President for Student Affairs.

A. COMPOSITION The University Conduct Council shall be composed of two (2) staff, two (2) faculty, three (3) students (ideally two (2) undergraduates and one (1) graduate student), and two (2) student alternates.

1. All seven (7) members may serve on any appellate board, but an official quorum for an appeal consists of a minimum of four (4) members, which includes at least one (1) faculty member, one (1) student member, and one (1) staff member.

2. An official quorum for an Honor Council appeal consists of a minimum of five (5) members, which includes at least two (2) faculty members, two (2) student members and one (1) staff member (see the Honor Code of SMU, Article VI, Section 3).

3. Student alternates may participate in all regularly scheduled meetings, but will not have voting rights as members of an appellate board, unless serving as designated substitutes for student members who are unable to serve.

4. The chairperson of the University Conduct Council, who is a voting member of an appellate board, shall be elected by the members of the University Conduct Council from among the faculty and staff members of University Conduct Council.

5. A vice chairperson of the University Conduct Council shall also be elected each year by University Conduct Council.

6. The University Conduct Council serves as a board of final appeal for appeals originating from University Conduct Boards, Honor Council hearings and Conduct Hearings, except when a sanction of expulsion is assigned (see section III A. 1.). Honor Council appeal procedures are set forth in Article VI of the Honor Code.

B. SELECTION OF MEMBERS

1. SELECTION OF STUDENT MEMBERS shall be accomplished in the spring each year and their appointment shall be for the succeeding academic year.

a. Students shall be limited to three (3) consecutive one-year terms, however they must reapply for membership each year.

b. Student members may not simultaneously serve on any other conduct board or in student government as an officer or student senator.

c. The Office of the Dean of Student Life will initiate contact with the Student Body President concerning selection of student members.

d. The Student Body President may nominate up to five (5) candidates to be interviewed.

e. The University Conduct Council may also nominate up to five (5) candidates.

f. The University Conduct Council and two (2) representatives, selected by the Student Body President, may interview all candidates.

g. The University Conduct Council Chair shall send recommendations to the President of the University. The President will appoint student members.

2. SELECTION OF FACULTY MEMBERS The Office of the Dean of Student Life will initiate contact with the Faculty Senate concerning selection of faculty members.

a. The Faculty Senate may nominate three (3) candidates.

b. The University Conduct Council also may nominate three (3) candidates.

c. The University Conduct Council and two (2) members of the Faculty Senate may interview all candidates and the University Conduct Council Chair shall send recommendations to the President of the University.

d. The President will appoint faculty members.

e. Faculty appointments are for three (3) years and shall be staggered so members are being appointed in different years.

f. Faculty may serve for more than one (1) three-year term. Terms may not be consecutive, however, exceptions to the above may be granted by the President of the University.

3. SELECTION OF STAFF MEMBERS

a. The Office of the Dean of Student Life will initiate contact with the Vice President for Student Affairs concerning staff members.

b. The Vice President will nominate three (3) candidates to be interviewed.

c. The University Conduct Council also may nominate three (3) candidates.

d. The University Conduct Council and two (2) members selected by the Vice President for Student Affairs may interview all candidates and the University Conduct Council Chair shall send recommendations to the President of the University.

e. The President will appoint staff members.

f. Staff appointments are for three (3) years and shall be staggered so that members are being appointed in different years.

g. Members replacing staff leaving before their term is over will be appointed for the balance of a term.

h. Staff may serve for more than one (1) three-year term. Terms may not be consecutive, however, exceptions to the above may be granted by the President of the University.

C. Constitutional questions concerning the Student Senate, which is governed by the Student Body Constitution, may be resolved by the University Conduct Council.

1. Such questions must be brought as a written petition to the council for consideration.

2. If the University Conduct Council agrees to consider the petition, it will meet as an appellate board at which both sides will be represented and a binding decision will be rendered.

3. The University Conduct Council may allow oral presentations concerning constitutional questions.

4. Petitions for such a hearing may originate from any Student Body Officer or Student Senator.

5. Also, any student with the signatures and student identification numbers of five percent of the currently enrolled full-time and part-time students, may petition for a hearing.

6. All such constitutional questions must first be submitted to the Executive Committee of the Student Senate, which will review the appeal or dispute as outlined in Article X of the Student Senate By-laws.

VI. REHEARINGS

With a written request from a student or a University Conduct Officer, showing good cause, the Dean of Student Life may consult with the chair of the University Conduct Board or a Conduct Officer and the Chair of the University Conduct Council and order that a case may be reheard. After such a rehearing, the student is entitled to appeal.

VII. RECORDS

The following policies concerning records and the release of information are in compliance with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (The Buckley Amendment).

A. Records in the Office of the Dean of Student Life shall contain all information; data, correspondence, findings, and records of official action concerning student discipline.

B. A disciplinary sanction will remain on file in the Office of the Dean of Student Life until it is erased three (3) years from the date of the final resolution of the last disciplinary proceeding. However, sanctions resulting in suspension or greater will remain in the Office of the Dean of Student Life indefinitely and may be released as appropriate under the law when questions related to disciplinary actions are asked.

C. Beginning their senior year, a student may request, through a written petition, to have their conduct file(s) expunged by the Dean of Student Life for good cause. Factors to be considered in review of such petitions shall include:

1. The present demeanor of the student.

2. The conduct of a student subsequent to the violation.

3. The nature of the violation and the severity of any damage, injury, or harm resulting from it.

There is no appeal of the decision made by the Dean of Student Life in response to an expungement request.

 

Last revision - 1 July 2009

 

 
The Office of the Dean of Student Life is a department in the Division of Student Affairs.