|
April 3, 2002 SCHOLARS TO DISCUSS UNILATERALISM AND MULTILATERALISM AT SMU DEDMAN SCHOOL OF LAW APRIL 5 DALLAS (SMU) -- How should nations behave in the 21st century? Should they go it alone on matters of global security or form coalitions with other nations to fight external threats? For the U.S., the choice of unilateralism versus multilateralism must be decided soon. To fight its war on terrorism, the U.S. will need to shape a foreign policy that is either in accordance with its allies or not. Already the decision is reaching a critical stage. The Bush administration has dispatched American troops to the Philippines, Yemen, Columbia, Uzbekistan, the Georgia republic and soon possibly Iraq. A unilateralist and multilateralist foreign policy will have different consequences for the U.S. and the world. The tensions and trade-offs between the two approaches span a range of international and legal issues relating to the economy, environment, military and human rights. "In a globalizing world still dominated by sovereigns, tensions between unilateral and multilateral behavior grow," said John Attanasio, dean of the SMU Dedman School of Law and the William Hawley Atwell Chair in Constitutional Law. "Problems like terrorism heighten the state of achieving a sophisticated, nuanced understanding of these respective approaches." The Dedman School of Law has convened a panel of experts in international relations, law and government to discuss the pros and cons of unilateralism and multilateralism. This year's distinguished Carrington Lecture will be a panel discussion titled, "Responding to Global Threats: The Cases for Unilateralism and Multilateralism," from 2 to 4 p.m. Friday, April 5, in the Hillcrest Room of the Underwood Law Library, 6550 Hillcrest Ave. In addition to Attanasio, the speakers on the panel will be the following:
The event is free and open to the public. For information about parking, contact the Dedman School of Law at 214-768-3341. |
|
|
-30- |
|
|
|
|