Integrating Conflict Resolution Theories:
Moving from Theory to Proposed Actions
1
Integrating Conflict Resolution Theories:
Moving from Theory to Proposed Actions
October, 2010
Instructor:
Daniel Rainey
Email and Phone:
Drainey500@gmail.com
571-243-9529 (mobile)Class Sessions:
October 1, 2, and 3, and October 15, 16, and 17, 2010Course Workspace
I will set up an online workspace for this course, on which I will post readings, course
material, and other information generated during our sessions. Only class members and
invited guests will have access to the workspace.
The only way I have to contact class members is through the SMU e-mail address
provided to us by the Department – even if you’ve given me a personal e-mail before, I
will begin by using the SMU e-mail address because I know it is current – PLEASE
CHECK YOUR SMU E-MAIL REGULARLY FOR UPDATES TO THIS SYLLABUS AND FOR
INFORMATION ABOUT THE CLASS.
Course Overview
This course is designed to help students learn methods of integrating multiple
approaches, stakeholders, and methods into practical conflict analysis and resolution
work.
The course will begin with a consideration of the nature of the “third party” in conflict
intervention, the basic goals involved in conflict intervention, and the basic framework in
which conflict system design occurs. Discussions and work in the course will be
structured around
Roles interveners can play, Goals interveners have for their work,and
Proposals for concrete action based on the perceived roles and goals.Students in the course will self-select into groups, based upon conflict intervention
opportunities presented by the instructor. The groups will be responsible for evaluating
the conflict situations, presenting a full conflict analysis, and proposing an intervention
strategy.
Integrating Conflict Resolution Theories:
Moving from Theory to Proposed Actions
2
Course Philosophy
The instructor for this class appreciates the myriad possible approaches to any conflict
situation, and the role that our own professional experiences, ethnic backgrounds,
religious beliefs, and political orientations play in the way we analyze and act. The
members of the class bring in many experiences and viewpoints, all of which can
contribute to our understanding of how conflict intervention develops. In light of this
acknowledgement, I invite you to:
a) Respect all points of view regardless of where you are on these issues;
b) Listen to gain insight; reflect on what the other person is trying to communicate;
c) Accept that we are here as a learning community, in which each person is both a
teacher and a learner.
Course Expectations
Due to the intensive nature of the three-day weekend format, the following expectations
will ensure that you get the most rewarding and engaging experience from the class.
Preparation
: The success of this class is dependent on our ability to discuss classreadings intelligently and to actively participate in class discussions. In the weeks
before the first class meeting there will be readings and assignments posted on the class
online workspace that must be completed before we get together face to face. We have
ambitious goals for the class and they cannot be met if everyone is not ready to work
when we get together.
Attendance:
Consistent attendance is required. Much of the time in class will bespent in working groups, developing the conflict analysis that is the centerpiece of the
course. If you are not in attendance, it is not possible for you to contribute
meaningfully.
Participation:
In order for us to really be a learning community, everyone mustparticipate fully in class discussions and in the group activities. It is the case that if you
pursue a career in conflict intervention of any kind, it is very likely that much of your
work will be done in conjunction with groups or teams. Being present and being
involved is essential for successful team work.
Integrating Conflict Resolution Theories:
Moving from Theory to Proposed Actions
3
REQUIRED BOOKS:
Costantino, Cathy A., and Christina Sickles Merchant. 1996. Designing Conflict
Management Systems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bernie Mayer. (2004) Beyond Neutrality. San Francisco: Jossey Bass (John Wiley).
Other readings will be assigned and will be available online before the first class
meeting.
COURSE ASSIGNMENTS & GRADES:
Assignment # 1 - Pre-Meeting Activity (10 percent)
Before the first class meeting each student must complete the online course survey,
read all of the assigned readings, and register for one of the work groups. The groups
will form around some specific conflict environments or issues identified by the
instructor. This is an individual grade based on completion of the survey and
membership in one of the working groups.
Assignment # 2 - Class Meetings (20 percent)
Each student must attend and be active in each of the face to face class meetings. This
is an individual grade based on attendance and activity.
Assignment # 3 - Conflict Analysis (25 percent)
Due: October 3, 2010
On Sunday, October 3, each work group will be responsible for presenting an initial
briefing to the class on their conflict analysis. The presentation must outline the conflict
environment, explain the roles and goals inherent in the group’s approach to the
conflict, and generally conform to the conflict analysis template we will develop in class.
This is a group grade.
Integrating Conflict Resolution Theories:
Moving from Theory to Proposed Actions
4
Assignment # 4 - Final Presentation (25 percent)
Due: October 11, 2010
On Sunday, October 17, each work group will be responsible for presenting a final
conflict analysis (adjusted from the initial presentation) and an outline of an intervention
strategy based on the analysis. Each group will have a maximum of two hours to
present the project and respond to questions from the class and instructor. This is a
group grade.
Assignment # 5 - Journal and Self Reflection: (20 percent)
Due: Nov. 1, 2010
Journal: Each student will be asked to keep a journal as she or he discusses
conflict analysis, application of theory, and possible intervention proposals with
the work group. The journal should include each student's notes regarding how
attitudes about conflict intervention changed during the course (if they did, in
fact, change), what was learned about conflict analysis and intervention design,
how this project relates to the other classes taken at SMU, and how the
information gained in the class will be used in future practice.
Self Reflection: In addition to the ongoing entries in the journal, each student
will prepare a journal summary as the last entry. The summary should be a
reflection on the experiences in this course, as well as a reflection on how the
overall content of the SMU dispute resolution program will contribute to each
student's future practice.
After the in-class presentation on October 17, each individual will have two weeks (until
close of business on Monday, November 1), to submit the journal with the final self
reflection. Please note that I will not look favorably on journals that are obviously
cobbled together at the last minute (and, yes, it is possible to tell when regular entries
have or have not been made) - please begin the journal when you start the readings for
the course and keep making entries on a regular basis throughout the course.
Integrating Conflict Resolution Theories:
Moving from Theory to Proposed Actions
5
The following scale, based on the department standard, will be used to calculate final
grades:
94-100 = A
90-93 = A-
87-89 = B+
84-86 = B
80-83 = B-
77-79 = C+
74-76 = C
70-73 = C
KeyLearning Objectives
How Achieved
1. Students will learn to apply conflict
resolution theory to the analysis of specific
conflict environments.
The major literature in the field addressing
third party roles, goals, and actions will be
discussed and applied to concrete conflict
environments.
2. Students will learn create and present
proposals for conflict intervention.
Working in teams, the students will engage
in analysis, theory application, budgeting,
and presentation of concrete proposals for
conflict intervention.
Integrating Conflict Resolution Theories:
Moving from Theory to Proposed Actions
6
NOTE:
The information below is required content for all SMU syllabi – the language
is taken from standard university guidelines.
Disability Accommodations
: Students needing academic accommodations for adisability must first contact Ms. Rebecca Marin, Coordinator, Services for Students with
Disabilities (214-768-4557) to verify the disability and establish eligibility for
accommodations. They should then schedule an appointment with the professor to
make appropriate arrangements. ( See University Policy No. 2.4.)
Religious Observance
: Religiously observant students wishing to be absent on theholidays that require missing class should notify their professors in writing at the
beginning of the semester, and should discuss with them, in advance, acceptable ways
of making up any work missed because of absence. ( See University Policy No. 1.9.)
Honor Code:
Students are reminded of the SMU Honor Code as referenced in theStudent Handbook. Intellectual integrity and academic honesty are both the foundation
and the goals for this program. Please reference and review the university policies on
the responsibilities, policies, and penalties regarding academic honesty at the URL
below:
http://www.smu.edu/studentlife/PCL_05_HC.asp
Class Decorum:
Turn off (or set on vibrate) all cell phones or pagers. Do not readnewspapers, books for other classes, or other outside reading material during class.
Walking into class late is disruptive as is leaving early. If you have to leave early, make
arrangements before class begins, and then, when you leave, do so quietly.
Professional respect and courtesy for your fellow students is imperative at all times.